Fill Out a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it's essential to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here’s a list of things you should and shouldn’t do:

• Do double-check all personal information, including name and SSN, for accuracy.
• Do use clear and concise language when describing duties and responsibilities.
• Do ensure that all required signatures are obtained before submission.
• Do submit the form in a timely manner to avoid delays in processing.
• Do keep a copy of the completed form for your records.
• Don't leave any sections blank unless explicitly stated as optional.
• Don't use abbreviations that may not be widely understood.
• Don't forget to include the rated NCO's email address in the appropriate section.
• Don't submit the form without reviewing the Privacy Act Statement.
• Don't rush through the completion; take your time to ensure everything is accurate.

The DA Form 2166-9-1, also known as the NCO Evaluation Report for Sergeants, is an essential document in the Army evaluation process. It provides a structured way to assess the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers. Alongside this form, several other documents are commonly utilized to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process. Below is a list of these documents, each with a brief description.

• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used by leaders to document counseling sessions with soldiers, focusing on performance, professional development, and personal issues.
• DA Form 1059: This form is the Service School Academic Evaluation Report. It evaluates a soldier's performance during a course and is crucial for assessing their educational achievements.
• DA Form 67-9: Known as the Officer Evaluation Report, this form is similar to the NCO evaluation but is used for commissioned officers. It assesses their performance and potential for future assignments.
• DA Form 7508: This is the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) Scorecard. It records the results of a soldier's physical fitness tests, which are a key component of their overall evaluation.
• DA Form 3349: This form is used to document a soldier's physical profile. It indicates any medical conditions that might affect their ability to perform certain duties.
• DA Form 2627: This is the Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ. It documents non-judicial punishment and is important for evaluating a soldier's conduct and discipline.
• DA Form 638: The Recommendation for Award form is used to recommend soldiers for awards and decorations based on their performance and achievements.
• DA Form 750: This is the Army's Enlisted Record Brief. It provides a snapshot of a soldier's career, including assignments, training, and awards, which can be valuable during evaluations.
• DA Form 4187: The Personnel Action form is used to document changes in a soldier's status, such as promotions, reassignments, or disciplinary actions.
• DA Form 3349: This is the Physical Profile form. It assesses a soldier's physical capabilities and any limitations that may impact their duties.

Utilizing these documents in conjunction with the DA Form 2166-9-1 helps create a well-rounded picture of a soldier's performance and potential. This comprehensive approach ensures that evaluations are fair, thorough, and aligned with the Army's standards and expectations.

Misconceptions about the DA 2166-9-1 form can lead to confusion and errors in the evaluation process. Here are nine common misconceptions, along with clarifications to help you better understand this important document.

• It is only for NCOs at the SGT level. The DA 2166-9-1 form is specifically designed for evaluating Sergeants (SGTs), but there are other forms for different ranks and positions within the Army.
• Completing the form is optional. The DA 2166-9-1 is a mandatory evaluation report for NCOs. It plays a crucial role in their career progression.
• The rater's assessment is the only factor considered. While the rater's evaluation is significant, the senior rater also provides input that can influence the overall assessment of the NCO.
• Signatures indicate agreement with the evaluation. The rated NCO's signature confirms that they have seen the report but does not imply agreement or disagreement with the content.
• Only performance metrics matter. The form evaluates various aspects, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement, not just numerical performance metrics.
• Feedback is not required. Raters must provide constructive comments for each evaluation area, ensuring that the rated NCO receives valuable feedback for improvement.
• The form can be submitted without a supplementary review. Depending on the circumstances, a supplementary review may be required, particularly for certain evaluations or to ensure fairness.
• There is no appeals process. The rated NCO has the right to appeal the evaluation if they believe there are inaccuracies or unfair assessments, as outlined in AR 623-3.
• Only the current duty assignment is considered. The evaluation includes a broader view, taking into account past assignments and future potential, which helps to assess the NCO's overall career trajectory.

Here are some key takeaways for filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form:

• Accurate Information: Ensure that all personal information, including name, SSN, and rank, is correct in Part I.
• Understand the Purpose: This form is used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs).
• Rater and Senior Rater Details: Complete the sections for both the rater and senior rater accurately, including signatures and dates.
• Performance Evaluation: Provide clear and specific comments in the performance evaluation section to reflect the NCO's strengths and areas for improvement.
• Regular Counseling: Document counseling dates to show that the NCO has received feedback throughout the evaluation period.
• Be Mindful of Standards: Assess the NCO against Army values and standards in each category, such as character and presence.
• Potential Assessment: The senior rater must evaluate the NCO’s potential compared to peers, selecting the appropriate category.
• Document Assignments: Include details of two successive assignments and one broadening assignment as part of the evaluation.
• Review Process: The rated NCO should understand that signing the form does not indicate agreement with the evaluation but confirms the accuracy of the information provided.